Broken Democracy

Until recently, the state of North Carolina, where I live, was a bastion of political moderation, especially compared to our neighbors in the southeast. Our politics were moderate in part because the Democratic Party remained relatively strong in the state, and to survive in this region of the country had embraced center left, rather than the far left. Our politics were also moderate because of the influx of Northerners, arriving to places like the Raleigh Durham area where I live. As a result of this moderation, we developed high-tech industry corridors, provided excellent funding to our educational system, and became a pretty darn nice place to live.
This past year, Republicans took control of state government, and did not exactly pursue an agenda of political moderation. Moreover, this swing to the right was not justified by the political beliefs of the North Carolina population. Instead, a decent amount of the Republican’s political power resulted from gerrymandering, after the 2010 census. To get a sense of that, take a look at this figure from Mother Jones.

 GOP gerrymandering

I am not a fan of gerrymandering, no matter what political party this practice benefits. Our elected officials ought to mirror the political allegiance of our population. And as a flaming moderate, politically speaking, I’m especially worried that gerrymandering is contributing to the increasing polarization of our population.
We really ought to give the job of political redistricting to nonpartisan commissions. Our democracy deserves better than this!
(Click here to view comments)

Medicare and the Desegregation of American Hospitals

segregated hospitalAs anyone who has followed the Obamacare roller coaster over the past 4 years knows, passing legislation is only the first step in reforming a healthcare system. Since Obamacare came into law, we have been consumed by battles over how to implement it, and by struggles over how to make it work effectively. But such implementation struggles are not new to Obamacare. We sometimes fail to remember that previous healthcare laws rolled out with a fair amount of controversy of their own.
For example, when Medicare was passed into law in 1965, the program was far from a done deal, especially in the South where Medicare threatened to end hospital segregation.
Federal programs had long been a challenge for those in the South who favored segregation. When Social Security was passed into law, southern Democrats managed to keep most black people out of Social Security by excluding farm and domestic workers from receiving such benefits. But Social Security eventually expanded to include these people, which did not please many southern conservatives. That’s why when Medicare was passed into law, they were determined to prevent it – another damn federal program – from interfering with the southern way of life… (Read and view comments at Forbes)

Discussing Financial Toxicity in Oncology Settings

ascoThe American Society of Clinical Oncology is one of the leading specialty organizations for physicians who take care of patients with cancer. A reporter from ASCO just wrote a nice piece, in which she questioned me to go into more detail about the challenge of discussing cost of care with oncology patients. I thought I would share that with you:

High costs of cancer treatments can be an “undisclosed toxicity” that can harm a patient’s overall health and well-being, according to an article in The New England Journal of Medicine. High medical bills can not only cause stress and anxiety but may also compel patients to cut back on spending for other basic needs—such as food, leading to less healthy diets—or to take medications less frequently than prescribed.
“This is a very frequent cause of nonadherence,” the article’s lead author,Peter A. Ubel, MD, Professor of Business, Public Policy, and Medicine at Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, said in an interview with The ASCO Post. “It is a medical problem. Patients may not be showing up for tests or taking their pills because they can’t afford it. Dr. Ubel also tackled the issue of physicians rarely discussing medical intervention costs in an op-ed article he wrote for The New York Times.
Not Always Easy to Know
“Because treatments can be ‘financially toxic,’ imposing out-of-pocket costs that may impair patients’ well-being, we contend that physicians need to disclose the financial consequences of treatment alternatives just as they inform patients about treatments’ side effects,” Dr. Ubel and colleagues wrote…(Read more here)

Should Death Row Inmates Be Able to Donate Their Organs Before They Die?

DEATH PENALTY VICTIMSSeveral people have asked me lately whether I think that death row inmates should be able to donate their organs before they die. In effect, to commit suicide through organ donation. Culminating in donation of the heart, of course. They are going to be executed anyway, why not bring benefits to others en route?
I see the logic of this position. Why inject someone with lethal medications and then dispose of their remains when so much good could come of their death?
But that’s where I have a problem with this policy: of making people feel that so much “good” can come out of executing people. I oppose organ donation from prisoners on death row because I oppose capital punishment. I think people should always have a chance at redemption, no matter what crimes they have committed. I do not think that capital punishment is, or can, be administered fairly in the United States. I do not think the criminal justice system is accurate enough to make me confident that people who are executed necessarily committed the crimes they had been accused of.
I oppose death-by-organ-donation because I don’t think we need any more reasons to look favorably upon the death penalty. We are practically alone amongst Western democracies in still using this form of punishment. I’d like to see that change.
(Click here to view comments)

Fair Wages and Happiness

According to traditional economic theory, when people perform jobs for pay, they decide whether the pay they receive is large enough to justify the effort they put into the task at hand. But what if someone else is doing the same work for more pay? They probably won’t feel so great about their jobs anymore, will they? How basic is this reaction?
Watch this fascinating video of Capuchin monkeys, one of whom feels he is getting screwed:

(Click here to view comments)

When It Came to Medicare Costs LBJ Concluded "What's $400 Million Between Friends!"

Lyndon_JohnsonLyndon Johnson’s advisers were worried. They were drafting a Medicare proposal, a major component of Johnson’s war on poverty. But the cost of this program was turning out to be much larger than expected. By their estimates, in the first year alone, they would face $400 million more in expenditures than they had budgeted for. The advisers asked Johnson what the administration should do, and Johnson replied: “Well, I guess I’ll run and get my brother.” That answer didn’t make sense to his aides, of course.  So he continued:

“Well, I remember one time they were giving a test to a fellow who was going to be a switch man on the railroad, giving him an intelligence test, and they said, ‘What would you do if a train was coming east going 60 mph, and you looked over your shoulder and another one was coming from the west going 60 mph?’  And the fellow said, ‘I’d go get my brother.’  And they said, ‘Why would you get your brother?’  And he said, ‘Because he hasn’t ever seen a train wreck.’”

Johnson was famous for using colorful yarns to calm his colleagues. When his colleagues pushed back on the cost of the impending legislation, he replied with another folksy story that put an end to any discussion of foregoing the legislation… (Read more and view comments at Forbes)

People's Stories Reveal Uncertainty About Who Obamacare Will Help

fayetteville observerThe Obamacare health insurance exchanges have been up and running for only a few months now, with a semi-functioning website active for even less time than that. So it is far too early to tell who will benefit and who will be harmed as the law continues to unfold. In the absence of solid data, that leaves us with stories. And here are a few stories, reported on in the Fayetteville Observer, to give you feel for the range of experiences people are having lately.

The Affordable Care Act has been a battle from the beginning, but the fiercest fight of all appears to be shaping up ahead of the midterm elections this year.
On one side, Republican critics say Obamacare has been a disaster that costs millions of Americans more money. On the other side, Democrats defend the health care law as helping millions of Americans finally afford insurance.

The narrative already is playing out in television ads, using examples of real people. U.S. Sen. Kay Hagan of North Carolina is a target of Republicans for her support of the Affordable Care Act, including one ad that features a Chapel Hill woman whose insurance was canceled and pays more for a temporary plan.

Meanwhile, the White House is releasing success stories from cancer survivors, the self-employed and people who see big reductions in premiums… (Read more at the Fayetteville Observer)

A Surprising Early Supporter of Obamacare: Eisenhower?

eisenhowerOn October 10, 1952, President Dwight Eisenhower gave a speech in Salt Lake City in which he reiterated his opposition to socialized medicine. In fact, he had long asserted that he would “use every single attribute and influence of the Presidential office to defeat any move toward socialized medicine.” But Ike also recognized that all Americans deserve some kind of basic medical care. Not long before his trip to Salt Lake, he had stated that: “Too many of our people live too far from adequate medical aid; too many of our people find the cost of adequate medical care too heavy.” Eisenhower’s compassion came in part from personal experience. He had seen his wife’s family “virtually wrecked” from having to pay big medical bills.
So how did Ike reconcile his opposition to socialized medicine with his recognition of medical needs? According to The Heart of Power, a wonderful book by David Blumenthal and James Morone, Eisenhower reconciled these two goals by pushing for federal subsidies of private insurance plans… (Read more and view comments at Forbes)

Obamacare and Entrepreneurship

entrepreneurIn a recent post, I argued that Obamacare – a.k.a. The Affordable Care Act – improves the economic marketplace because it levels the playing field, between employers who do and do not offer health insurance to their employees.
Now comes a new study contending that Obamacare also improves the marketplace, by promoting entrepreneurship. I thought I would share a link to that study here:

The Affordable Care Act, otherwise known as Obamacare, could encourage 1.2 million people to leave steady jobs and strike out on their own, according to a report released in May by the Center on Health Insurance Reforms at Georgetown University, the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation, and the Urban Institute. The reasoning the three think tanks gave for their bold prediction was simple: The availability of low-cost health plans for all will unshackle would-be entrepreneurs from a phenomenon known as “job lock,” where people feel pressured to stay with less-than-optimal employers solely so they can hold onto their health benefits… (Read more here)

PeterUbel